Shirley Stewart; Larry Stewart v. Hsbc Bank USA

10-2133Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.01.2011

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2133
SHIRLEY STEWART; LARRY STEWART,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
HSBC BANK USA; MERS, Mortgage Electronic Registration
System, Incorporated; DELTA FUNDING CORPORATION, d/b/a
Fidelity Mortgage; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; NECTAR
PROJECTS, INCORPORATED; LAW OFFICES OF SHAPIRO & BRUNSON,
LLP; RENAISSANCE MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00586-RLW)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shirley Stewart, Larry Stewart, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Shirley and Larry Stewart appeal the district court’s
order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failure
to comply with Fed. Rules Civ. P. 8 and 9. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. HSBC Bank
USA, No. 3:10-cv-00586-RLW (E.D. Va. Sept. 3, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.