Michael Knights v. STIHL INCORPORATED, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2118
MICHAEL KNIGHTS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STIHL INCORPORATED, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and
Individual Capacity); GUY WALLACE, (Third Party
Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity); EARL SYKES,
(Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual
Capacity); OXFORD GLOBAL RESOURCES, (Contracting Capacity),
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00260-RAJ-DEM)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Knights, Appellant Pro Se. Robert W. McFarland,
MCGUIREWOODS, LLP , Norfolk, Virginia; Melanie Gayle Augustin,
Thomas Joseph Flaherty, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., McLean,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Knights appeals the district court’s final
order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Knights v. Stihl
Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00260-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2010; Aug.
5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --