Matthew Borowski; Carianne Borowski v. Teresa Polinske, in her official

10-2107Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.03.2011

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2107
MATTHEW BOROWSKI; CARIANNE BOROWSKI,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
TERESA POLINSKE, in her official and individual capacities;
STEVEN D. EPPLE, in his official and individual capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00197-AJT-JFA)
Submitted: February 18, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Borowski, Carianne Borowski, Appellants Pro Se.
Alexander Francuzenko, COOK, KITTS & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew and Carianne Borowski appeal a district
court’s order granting Detective Stephen D. Epple’s and
Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Teresa Polinske’s motions to
dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failing to state a
claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court.
See Borowski v. Polinske, No. 1:10-cv-00197-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va.
filed Aug. 24, 2010; entered Aug. 25, 2010). We deny the
Borowskis’ motion for oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.