Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-2069•Chahdad C. Bolouri v. Bank of America, N.a.
10-2069Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.08.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2069
CHAHDAD C. BOLOURI,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. as acquirer
of certain assets and liabilities of Washington Mutual Bank
from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver
for Washington Mutual Bank; PROFESSIONAL FORECLOSURE
CORPORATION OF VIRGINIA,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00225-LO-TCB)
Submitted: August 1, 2011 Decided: August 11, 2011
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Edwin Brown, BROWN, BROWN & BROWN, PC, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellant. John C. Lynch, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP,
Virginia Beach, Virginia; Jonathan S. Hubbard, TROUTMAN SANDERS,
LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Bizhan Beiramee, RATHBUN & GOLDBERG,
PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chahdad C. Bolouri appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss
his state law claims for declaratory judgment, quiet title, and
negligence, and his claim under the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1692-1692p (West 2009 & Supp.
2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See
Bolouri v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 1:10-cv-00225-LO-TCB (E.D.
Va. August 24, 2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., N.A.,
641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir. 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.