Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-1917•Robert Love Taylor, Jr. v. State of Virginia Division of Child Support Enforcement; Elaine Jackson Kerns
10-1917Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.10.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1917
ROBERT LOVE TAYLOR, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STATE OF VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT;
ELAINE JACKSON KERNS,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00803-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010
Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Love Taylor, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Love Taylor, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus show cause.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Taylor v. State of Va. Div. of Child Support
Enforcement, No. 1:10-cv-00803-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. July 22, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.