John Fitzgerald Brown v. Thomas Supply Company, Incorporated

10-1879Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.01.2011

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1879
JOHN FITZGERALD BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS SUPPLY COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (2:08-cv-03124-CWH)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Fitzgerald Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Edward Justice,
Jr., Joseph Jakob Kennedy, TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEY, PA,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
John Fitzgerald Brown appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant in Brown’s
Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Brown v. Thomas Supply Co., Inc., No.
2:08-cv-03124-CWH (D.S.C. July 2, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.