Samuel G. Bailey v. Black Entertainment Television, Inc.; Paramount; Viacom

10-1623Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.09.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1623
SAMUEL G. BAILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, INC.; PARAMOUNT; VIACOM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:09-cv-00787-JRS)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel G. Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. John B. O’Keefe, LEVINE
SULLIVAN KOCH & SCHULZ, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel G. Bailey appeals the district court’s order
denying his copyright complaint against Black Entertainment
Television, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Bailey v. Black Entm’t Television, Inc.,
No. 3:009-cv-00787-JRS (E.D. Va. May 3, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.