Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-1616•Grace Morris v. Rhonda Rae Marrin
10-1616Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.12.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1616
GRACE MORRIS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RHONDA RAE MARRIN,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00050-JRS; 08-32473-DOT; 08-03116-DOT)
Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Grace Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Rhonda Rae Marrin, Appellee Pro
Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Grace Morris appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court order for
failure to comply with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8006. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible
error and no abuse of discretion. See Fed. R. Bankr. P.
8001(a); In re SPR Corp., 45 F.3d 70, 74 (4th Cir. 1995); In re
Serra Builders, Inc., 970 F.2d 1309, 1311 (4th Cir. 1992).
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Morris v. Marrin, No. 3:10-cv-00050-JRS (E.D. Va.
Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.