Audrey Clement; John Reeder v. RAY H. LAHOOD, U. S. Department of Transportation

10-1531Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.10.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1531
AUDREY CLEMENT; JOHN REEDER,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
and
JOSHUA RUEBNER,
Plaintiff,
v.
RAY H. LAHOOD, U. S. Department of Transportation; VICTOR
MENDEZ, Administrator Federal Highway Administration;
ROBERTO FONSECO-MARTINEZ, Virginia Division Administrator,
Federal Highway Administration; DAVID S. EKERN,
Commissioner, Virginia Department of Transportation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-01056-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: August 17, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Audrey Clement, John Reeder, Appellants Pro Se. Allen M.
Brabender, Bernard G. Kim, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Washington, D.C.; Christopher Dwight Eib, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Audrey Clement and John Reeder appeal the district
court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the
Government and dismissing Clement’s civil complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Clement and Reeder’s motion for a stay pending appeal
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Clement v. LaHood, No. 1:09-cv-01056-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 30,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.