Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-1529•Oliver R. Coleman v. Prince George’s County Department of Social Services
10-1529Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.02.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1529
OLIVER R. COLEMAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:09-cv-00213-DKC)
Submitted: January 19, 2011 Decided: February 2, 2011
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oliver R. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Julia Doyle Bernhardt,
Assistant Attorney General, Bradley Neitzel, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Oliver R. Coleman appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Coleman v. Prince George’s County Dep’t of Soc. Servs.,
No. 8:09-cv-00213-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.