Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-1448•Penny K. Yohe v. Commissioner of Social Security
10-1448Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.03.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1448
PENNY K. YOHE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00075-FPS-JES)
Submitted: February 23, 2011 Decided: March 14, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy F. Cogan, CASSIDY MYERS COGAN & VOEGELIN, L.C.,
Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. Eric Kressman, Regional
Chief Counsel, Maija Pelly, Acting Supervisory Attorney,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Betsy C. Jividen, United States
Attorney, Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Attorney, Nicole A. Schmid, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Penny K. Yohe appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting
the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment and affirming the
decision of the Commissioner to deny Yohe supplemental security
income benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Yohe v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 5:09-
cv-00075-FPS-JES (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 6, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.