James E. Huff v. United States Department of the Army

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1436
JAMES E. HUFF,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.
(1:05-cv-00805-BEL)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James E. Huff, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James E. Huff appeals the district court’s order
denying his “motion to resume complaint,” which the district
court construed as a motion to reopen, and for the appointment
of counsel. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). While
Huff’s informal brief asserts various errors in the district
court’s order dismissing his civil action, which was issued in
September 2007, it does not challenge the district court’s
disposition of the motion that is the subject of this appeal.
Thus, we hold Huff has forfeited appellate review of that order.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --