Thomas Green v. Gwen T. Hyatt

10-1303Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.06.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1303
THOMAS GREEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GWEN T. HYATT,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:09-cv-02573-TLW)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Green appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice Green’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Green v. Hyatt, No. 4:09-cv-02573-TLW
(D.S.C. Feb. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.