Randy Williams; Mary Williams v. Apac Atlantic, Inc.; Apac, Inc.; Apac Carolina Inc.

10-1237Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.06.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1237
RANDY WILLIAMS; MARY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
APAC ATLANTIC, INC.; APAC, INC.; APAC CAROLINA INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:08-cv-03432-JFA)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy Williams, Mary Williams, Appellants Pro Se. Clayton
Monroe Custer, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Greenville,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Randy and Mary Williams appeal the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on the
Williams’s civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Plaintiffs’
motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.,
No. 3:08-cv-03432-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.