United States of America v. Marlin Rainey

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8049
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MARLIN RAINEY,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3)
Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 5, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marlin Rainey, Appellant Pro Se. Irvin McCreary Allen, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; Robert Eric Friedman, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Marlin Rainey appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Request for Nunc Pro Tunc and Amended Judgment.”
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Rainey, No. 1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3 (E.D.
Va. filed Oct. 21, 2009; entered Oct. 22, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --