United States of America v. Curtis Antonio Reese

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8003
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CURTIS ANTONIO REESE,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:03-cr-00729-CMC-1)
Submitted: February 18, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Antonio Reese, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Antonio Reese appeals the district court’s
order denying Reese’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Reese, No. 3:03-cr-00729-CMC-1 (D.S.C.
Oct. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --