United States of America v. Nigel Clarke

09-7993Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.01.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7993
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NIGEL CLARKE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00060-H-5)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 28, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nigel Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A.
Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Nigel Clarke appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for discovery and to proceed in forma
pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Clarke, No. 4:02-cr-00060-H-5
(E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.