Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7964•Leamon L. Tatum v. Correctional Medical Services
09-7964Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.09.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7964
LEAMON L. TATUM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
WARDEN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:09-cv-00875-WDQ)
Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: September 13, 2010
Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leamon L. Tatum, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Ryan
Alexander Mitchell, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Leamon L. Tatum appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Tatum v. Corr. Med. Services, No. 1:09-cv-00875-WDQ (D.
Md. Oct. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.