Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7836•United States of America v. Barry Earl Williams
09-7836Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.01.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7836
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BARRY EARL WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (3:00-cr-00177-RLW-1)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 28, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Earl Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Barry Earl Williams appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to modify the eighteen-month sentence the
district court imposed upon finding Williams had violated the
terms of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record
and the issues raised on appeal and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Williams, No. 3:00-cr-00177-RLW-1
(E.D. Va. filed Sept. 17; entered Sept. 18, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.