Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7805•United States of America v. Charles Emanuel Rash, a/k/a Chaz, a/k/a Charlie
09-7805Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.12.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7805
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES EMANUEL RASH, a/k/a Chaz, a/k/a Charlie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1)
Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Emanuel Rash, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,
Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Oliver Mucklow,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence, which Rash
styled as a petition for writ of audita querela. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Rash, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W. Va. Sept.
15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.