Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7775•Kendall Cohen v. AL CANNON, JR., Sheriff; SHAWN JAMES, Deputy
09-7775Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.12.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7775
KENDALL COHEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
AL CANNON, JR., Sheriff; SHAWN JAMES, Deputy,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:08-cv-03327-HMH)
Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kendall Cohen, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK LAW
FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kendall Cohen appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) motion to reconsider its
order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant
Defendants summary judgment on Cohen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. See Cohen v. Cannon, No. 2:08-cv-03327-HMH (D.S.C.
Aug. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.