Andrew D. Wenmoth v. OVID WESLEY DUNCAN, JR., Librarian

ON REHEARING
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7750
ANDREW D. WENMOTH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OVID WESLEY DUNCAN, JR., Librarian; LARRY MCBRIDE,
Correctional Officer II; KENNY AIKENS, Correctional Hearing
Officer; DIANA ROBIN MILLER, Associate Warden of Programs;
TERESA WAID, Warden; JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner; CHARLENE
SOTAK, Inmate Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 09-7826
ANDREW D. WENMOTH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OVID WESLEY DUNCAN, JR., Librarian; LARRY MCBRIDE,
Correctional Officer II; KENNY AIKENS, Correctional Hearing
Officer; DIANA ROBIN MILLER, Associate Warden of Programs;
TERESA WAID, Warden; JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner; CHARLENE
SOTAK, Inmate Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants - Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
No. 10-6073
ANDREW D. WENMOTH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OVID WESLEY DUNCAN, JR., Librarian; LARRY MCBRIDE,
Correctional Officer II; KENNY AIKENS, Correctional Hearing
Officer; DIANA ROBIN MILLER, Associate Warden of Programs;
TERESA WAID, Warden; JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner; CHARLENE
SOTAK, Inmate Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00182-JPB-JSK)
Submitted: May 13, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010
Before DUNCAN and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew D. Wenmoth, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas E. Buck, April Joy
Wheeler, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Andrew D. Wenmoth
appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wenmoth’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Wenmoth v. Duncan, No. 3:08-cv-00182-JPB-JSK
(N.D. W. Va. Aug. 26, 2009 & Dec. 18, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --