Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7683•United States of America v. JOVITO MATAS BINOYA, II, a/k/a Jay
09-7683Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.12.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7683
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOVITO MATAS BINOYA, II, a/k/a Jay,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (07-cr-00319-TSE-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 30, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jovito Matas Binoya, II, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph
Grooms, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jovito Matas Binoya, II, appeals the district court’s
order denying his “Motion to Compel; Motion to Request Specific
Performance of the Government to Grant Reduction of Sentence for
Substancial [sic] Assistance.” We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Binoya,
No. 1:07-cr-00319-TSE-1 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26, 2009; entered
Aug. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.