Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7564•Orlando David Almond v. JAMES M. SISK, Manager, Intake & Legal Services
09-7564Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.04.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7564
ORLANDO DAVID ALMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES M. SISK, Manager, Intake & Legal Services,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate
Judge. (3:08-cv-00138-MHL)
Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orlando David Almond, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Bland Curwood,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Orlando David Almond appeals the magistrate judge’s
order∗
AFFIRMED
dismissing as untimely filed Almond’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Almond v. Sisk, No. 3:08-cv-00138-MHL
(E.D. Va. Aug. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
∗ The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.