Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7510•United States of America v. Tony B. Alexander
09-7510Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.11.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7510
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TONY B. ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00178-MR)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tony Alexander appeals from the district court’s order
granting in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), but denying his motion to the
extent that Alexander sought a resentencing. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Alexander, No. 3:95-cr-00178-MR (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009); see
United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.), cert.
denied, 129 S. Ct. 2401 (2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.