United States of America v. Reginald Jerome Stowe

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7492
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
REGINALD JEROME STOWE,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:96-cr-00046-FDW-1)
Submitted: September 28, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Jerome Stowe, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Jerome Stowe appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his post-judgment motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Stowe, No. 3:96-cr-00046-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. July 21 & 31,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --