Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7425•United States of America v. Akeem Labeeb Al-Muwwakkil
09-7425Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.10.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7425
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
AKEEM LABEEB AL-MUWWAKKIL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (4:01-cr-00092-RGD-1; 4:08-cv-00126-RGD)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Akeem Labeeb Al-Muwwakkil, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Woodrow
Hoffman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Akeem Labeeb Al-Muwwakkil appeals the district court’s
order denying his Rule 60(b) motion of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure in which Al-Muwwakkil attempted to revisit an
order issued during his criminal trial denying a motion to
suppress. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Al-Muwwakkil, No. 4:01-cr-
00092-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. July 15, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.