Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7388•Robert Carswell v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, USP Lee
09-7388Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.11.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7388
ROBERT CARSWELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, USP Lee,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:09-cv-00191-jct-mfu)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Carswell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Carswell seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition for a writ
of habeas corpus without prejudice for failure to comply with
the filing fee order. On appeal, we confine our review to
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. Rule
34(b). Carswell’s brief fails to challenge the district court’s
dispositive conclusion that he failed to pay the filing fee for
his § 2241 petition. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the
district court. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.