Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7209•Christopher Demont Owens v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
09-7209Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit08.10.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7209
CHRISTOPHER DEMONT OWENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WARDEN MCCALL;
CLAYTOR, Assistant Warden; MAUNCY, Assistant Warden; MAJOR
BUSH; LIEUTENANT MONROE; SERGEANT COTTER; LIEUTENANT HAROFF;
INVESTIGATOR SHUGART, Investigator; PEARSON, STG
Investigator; OFFICER MCBEE; OFFICER DILLARD; JEAN RUTLEDGE;
AMY ENLOC, Nurse; ALEWINE, Nurse; COMMISSIONER OZMINT,
Director; BOB OLSON, Food Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:09-cv-00278-GRA-BHH)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Demont Owens, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor
McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Demont Owens appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Owens v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:09-cv-00278-GRA-
BHH (D.S.C. June 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.