David Karl Danser v. Warden Stansberry

09-7187Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.11.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7187
DAVID KARL DANSER,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN STANSBERRY,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:07-cv-00271-JBF-TEM)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Karl Danser, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David Karl Danser, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his
previously dismissed 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Danser v. Stansberry, No. 2:07-cv-00271-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr.
16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.