Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-7098•Chester L. Hickman, Jr. v. ROBERT MCDONNELL, Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General, etc.
09-7098Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.02.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7098
CHESTER L. HICKMAN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT MCDONNELL, Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney
General, etc., et al.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00163-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: February 2, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chester L. Hickman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chester L. Hickman, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Hickman v. McDonnell, No.
2:09-cv-00163-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.