Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-6920•Eduard Lorenz v. PATRICIA H. HARRINGTON, Clerk, Supreme Court of Virginia
09-6920Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.09.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6920
EDUARD LORENZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA H. HARRINGTON, Clerk, Supreme Court of Virginia,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00456-JCC-IDD)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.*
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eduard Lorenz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
* The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eduard Lorenz appeals a district court order denying a
petition for a writ of mandamus in which he sought an order from
the court directing that the Clerk of the Supreme Court of
Virginia allow him to proceed in forma pauperis. We affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Lorenz v. Harrington, No.
1:09-cv-00456-JCD-IDD (E.D. Va. May 4, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.