Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-6711•Carlton Ray Barber, Jr. v. TODD HARRIS, Detective, Robeson County Sheriff’s Dept.
09-6711Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.12.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6711
CARLTON RAY BARBER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TODD HARRIS, Detective, Robeson County Sheriff’s Dept.;
ROBESON COUNTY CLERK OF COURT; ROBERT D. JACOBSON, Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03153-FL)
Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 2, 2009
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlton Ray Barber, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carlton Barber, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Barber’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Barber v. Harris,
No. 5:08-ct-03153-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.