Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-6679•Bryant Elliott Davidson v. State of Maryland; Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
09-6679Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.02.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6679
BRYANT ELLIOTT DAVIDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:08-cv-00524-WDQ)
Submitted: February 9, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bryant Elliott Davidson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane
Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bryant Elliott Davidson appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on
Davidson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Davidson v.
Maryland, No. 1:08-cv-00524-WDQ (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.