United States of America v. Carlos Shenick White

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6532
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CARLOS SHENICK WHITE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:98-cr-00009-H-1)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 25, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlos Shenick White, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes,
Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Shenick White appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. White, No. 4:98-cr-
00009-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2009). We deny White’s motion for
a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --