Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-6486•United States of America v. Michael Christopher Corpening, a/k/a Michael Lewis Corpening, a/k/a Mike Boggie
09-6486Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.08.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6486
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER CORPENING, a/k/a Michael Lewis
Corpening, a/k/a Mike Boggie,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00037-RLV-DCK-7)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Christopher Corpening, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth
Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Christopher Corpening appeals the district
court’s order partially granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Corpening’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Corpening, No. 5:03-cr-00037-RLV-DCK-7 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.