Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-6297•Stephen Yagman v. Tracy Johns
09-6297Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.07.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6297
STEPHEN YAGMAN,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
TRACY JOHNS,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:08-hc-02103-D)
Submitted: June 9, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erwin Chemerinsky, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE SCHOOL OF
LAW, Irvine, California, for Appellant. Christina Ann Thompson,
BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Yagman, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition and denying his motion for sanctions. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yagman
v. Johns, No. 5:08-hc-02103-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2009). We deny
Yagman’s motion to schedule oral argument and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.