United States of America v. Darrol J. Harrison, a/k/a Big D

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DARROL J. HARRISON, a/k/a Big D,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (2:92-cr-00446-DCN-1)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrol J. Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Darrol J. Harrison appeals from the district court’s
order granting in part his motion for reduction of sentence
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), but denying his motion
to the extent that Harrison sought a resentencing. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Harrison, No. 2:92-cr-00446-DCN-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 27,
2009); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.
2009). We deny Harrison’s motions for appointment of counsel
and for an extension of time and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --