Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-6219•United States of America v. Ronald Wayne Lewis
09-6219Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.05.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6219
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RONALD WAYNE LEWIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-6221
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RONALD WAYNE LEWIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:07-cr-00104-JRS-1)
Submitted: April 28, 2009 Decided: May 14, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Wayne Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Christopher
Nunnally, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Wayne Lewis seeks to appeal the district
court’s order granting his motion for an independent firearms
expert (No. 09-6219), and denying his motion for review of the
status of counsel (No. 09-6221). This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Lewis seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for
lack of jurisdiction. Additionally, we deny Lewis’ motion for
release on bond pending appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 9(A)(3), and
deny his motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.