Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-6162•Timothy G. Norman v. Elexia Craig
09-6162Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.05.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6162
TIMOTHY G. NORMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ELEXIA CRAIG; RASHAD ROYSTER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROUMMEL;
SERGEANT THOMAS JOYNER; DENNIS ROWLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:07-ct-03128-H)
Submitted: April 22, 2009 Decided: May 11, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy G. Norman, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons,
Assistant Attorney General, Oliver Gray Wheeler, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy G. Norman appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Norman’s motion for appointment of counsel
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Norman v. Craig, No. 5:07-ct-03128-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.