Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-6149•Annis Recardo Lloyd v. I. B. Lovell; D. D. Gronau
09-6149Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.05.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6149
ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
I. B. LOVELL; D. D. GRONAU,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:08-ct-03174-H)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 29, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Annis Recardo Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Annis Recardo Lloyd appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action raising
allegations of defamation. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Lovell, No. 5:08-ct-
03174-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2009). We deny as moot Lloyd’s
motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.