Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-6002•United States of America v. CLARENCE LEE BASSETT, JR., a/k/a Junie
09-6002Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.06.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLARENCE LEE BASSETT, JR., a/k/a Junie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (4:03-cr-00069-RGD-TEM-1)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Lee Bassett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Bassett, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a judicial inquiry and seeking an
evidentiary hearing on the Government’s refusal to file a Fed.
R. Crim. P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Bassett, No.
4:03-cr-00069-RGD-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.