Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-2408•Ronald M. Childress v. United States of America
09-2408Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.08.2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2408
RONALD M. CHILDRESS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (3:08-cv-03922-RJC)
Submitted: October 7, 2010 Decided: August 10, 2011
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Everett J. Mercer, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellant.
William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Terri Hearn Bailey,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald M. Childress appeals the district court’s order
granting the Government’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) motion to
dismiss his claims against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act,
28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. See Childress v. United
States, No. 3:08-cv-03922-RJC (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.