Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-2395•Walter D. Hayes v. W. WARE MORRISON, Attorney & Counselor at Law
09-2395Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.04.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2395
WALTER D. HAYES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
W. WARE MORRISON, Attorney & Counselor at Law; PROVIDENT
LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY; EDWARD E. ROLLINS, JR.;
GLADYS HAYES-OWENS; CHARLES EVERETT MALONE, Attorney at Law,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00431-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter D. Hayes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Walter D. Hayes appeals the district court’s order
denying reconsideration of the dismissal for lack of
jurisdiction of Hayes’ civil complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Hayes’ motion to overturn the district court’s decision and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v.
Morrison, No. 2:09-cv-00431-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.