Michael Moment v. Martin O’malley

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2090
MICHAEL MOMENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARTIN O’MALLEY; DOUGLAS F. GANSLER; ISIAH LEGGEIL; ANN
HARRINGTON; THOMAS L. CRAVEN; BRIAN G. KIM; JESSICA M. HALL;
JOHN M. STAYER; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:09-cv-02209-AW)
Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Moment, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Moment appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant
to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.∗ We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Moment v. O’Malley
AFFIRMED
, No.
8:09-cv-02209-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 16, 2009; entered Sept. 17,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
∗ Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S.
462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).

-- 2 of 2 --