Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1934•Donna H. Riddick v. City of Elizabeth City
09-1934Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.01.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1934
DONNA H. RIDDICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ELIZABETH CITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Clinton. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (2:08-cv-00025-F)
Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 20, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donna H. Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. John D. Leidy, HORNTHAL,
RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, LLP, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donna H. Riddick appeals the district court’s order
granting her employer’s motion for summary judgment and
dismissing her complaint of racial discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riddick
v. City of Elizabeth City, No. 2:08-cv-00025-F (E.D.N.C. July
15, 2009). We also deny Riddick’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.