Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1840•Thomas C. Burcher v. Siemans Automotive Corporation
09-1840Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.02.2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1840
THOMAS C. BURCHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SIEMANS AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman,
District Judge. (4:08-cv-00106-JBF)
Submitted: February 11, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010
Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher D. Supino, Adam H. Lotkin, NORRIS, ST. CLAIR &
LOTKIN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Shepherd D.
Wainger, Erin Q. Ashcroft, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas C. Burcher appeals the district court’s order
granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Burcher v. Siemans Automotive Corp., No. 4:08-cv-00106-JBF (E.D.
Va. June 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.