Derek Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services and Leasing Company

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1835
DEREK JARVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 09-1953
DEREK JARVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge.
(8:07-cv-03385-DKC)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Michelle
Bodley Radcliffe, ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC,
Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Derek Jarvis seeks to appeal the district court’s
paperless orders denying his motions to stay and to recuse the
magistrate judge and the district court’s order granting
Defendant’s motion for sanctions related to Defendant’s motion
to compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Jarvis seeks to appeal is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --