Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-1758•TODD M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee v. WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley County
09-1758Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.09.2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1758
TODD M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley
County,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District
Judge. (5:09-cv-00046-gec)
Submitted: August 28, 2009 Decided: September 9, 2009
Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Jack v. Stubblefield, No. 5:09-cv-00046-gec
(W.D. Va. filed June 22, entered June 23, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.