Veenu Mehta v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, a Federal Agency

09-1755Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.07.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1755
VEENU MEHTA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the United States
Postal Service, a Federal Agency,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga,
District Judge. (1:07-cv-01257-AJT-TRJ)
Submitted: June 4, 2010 Decided: July 14, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Veenu Mehta, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Kevin J.
Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Veenu Mehta appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee in this
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Mehta v. Potter,
No. 1:07-cv-01257-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed June 4, 2009 & entered
June 5, 2009). We deny Mehta’s motion to file a formal brief.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.